There are emblem glyphs that archaeologists do not know the sites for. That is, an emblem glyph was a ruler’s way of declaring that he or his ancestors were given the right to rule from his emblem glyph's origin place.Ĭonsideration: Unidentified Emblem Glyphs There’s also a theory you might see that wonders if emblem glyphs main signs were names for “origin places” – and that an emblem glyph may have been a statement of power. They might be names for lineages, for a location or for dynasties. It’s not entirely certain what emblem glyphs were referring to. Before 500 AD, the ancient Maya would put it either before or after a ruler's name - after 500 AD, they just did the latter. ![]() Another possible explanation is that the younger of the two people is being described as a future ruler.Īs to their location in an inscription, that depends on the time period you look at. One theory about this says that these were times where sites (such as Calakmul) were ruled by two people at once, with one being more powerful than the other. However, the more important of the two has kaloomte' as part of their titles, while the less important one doesn't. (Which could mean different things, including the possibility that they were both ruled by rulers from the same royal family.)Īrchaeologists have also found inscriptions where pairs of people - brothers or sons and fathers - both have the emblem glyph. And there are some sites that use the same emblem glyphs - like Palenque and Tortuguero. For example, Tikal's emblem glyph is read ch'ul/ k'ul mutul ajaw, with mutul being the reconstructed name for the site.īoth rulers of city-states that controlled other city-states as well as rulers of city-states that were controlled used emblem glyphs. Instead, it's understood that the ajaw glyph is really said last - even though it is on top of the "main sign" glyph. Or perhaps Kan, kingdom aka the "snake kingdom."Įven though the usual method for successfully reading Mayan inscriptions involves reading top, left, then right, that's not how emblem glyphs are read. One of several known emblem glyphs for the Kaan, A third alternate you may find is it being transliterated as k'uhul. Under the ajaw glyph went the “main sign,” which the Maya tended to place “on top” of the k’uh glyph.Īlternately, you may see that the glyph with the rows of dots is transliterated as k’ul or ch’ul - with no mention of k’uhul or layering. To the right of the k’an cross was a glyph for ajaw or “lord”. (A k’an cross is a cross surrounded by a circular border.) This is made of the k’uh glyph (the god C glyph, which looks like a head) paired with a glyph that the Maya popularly drew as one or more curving rows of dots with a “k’an cross” on top. ![]() In 1958, Berlin found that there were certain groups of three glyphs that only changed one glyph, the "main sign." He thought that these glyph groups, which he called emblem glyphs, seemed to be about founding families or the names of places.Īn emblem glyph, in one view, starts with the adjective k’uhul. It was a man named Heinrich Berlin who began the rediscovery of emblem glyphs. As to their meaning, debate still exists as to the nuances this title held in ancient Maya thought. When used, an emblem glyph would be placed next to the ruler's name. ![]() It is understood to translate as "holy lord of such and such place" - with each city-state's/polity's name put in the "such and such place" spot. Rediscovered in the late 1950s, the emblem glyph (actually made of several glyphs) is an ancient Maya title. The glyphs, you can spot several emblem glyphs. ![]() Detail of a relief that dates to the 700s AD.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |